Difference between revisions of "Talk:Test-page"

From c34.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Not sure what "summary" is, but this is my first reaction to mediawiki)
 
(discussion editing process remarks)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
I must admit that the editing/formatting feature of this wiki app leave something to be desired.  I experimented with headlining and italasizing above.  It's awkward, but actually makes a nice simple page.  I guess I've gotten so used to wysiwyg on the fly that the old "wordperfect" control codes (well, not really control codes, but the buttons seem that way) seems archaic.
 
I must admit that the editing/formatting feature of this wiki app leave something to be desired.  I experimented with headlining and italasizing above.  It's awkward, but actually makes a nice simple page.  I guess I've gotten so used to wysiwyg on the fly that the old "wordperfect" control codes (well, not really control codes, but the buttons seem that way) seems archaic.
 +
 +
== Discussion tab is an unfortunate configuration ==
 +
 +
I would much rather see the discussion content integrated into the same page template as the "article" page.  I wonder if the layout controls give us enough flexibility to mix content types (i.e., "article" and "discussion") on the same page?
 +
 +
 +
== Lost content ==
 +
I just lost a bunch of content that I had written here.  Not sure how I did it, but it suggests that it might be pretty easy to lose what you're working on.

Latest revision as of 04:08, 7 March 2008

Reaction to this test page

Dave, that's a great shot. Is that your boat, or did you take it from your boat of a competitor? I'm always amazed when I see shots like this of our boats on lee side that it appears that our topsides are so dimunitive.

I must admit that the editing/formatting feature of this wiki app leave something to be desired. I experimented with headlining and italasizing above. It's awkward, but actually makes a nice simple page. I guess I've gotten so used to wysiwyg on the fly that the old "wordperfect" control codes (well, not really control codes, but the buttons seem that way) seems archaic.

Discussion tab is an unfortunate configuration

I would much rather see the discussion content integrated into the same page template as the "article" page. I wonder if the layout controls give us enough flexibility to mix content types (i.e., "article" and "discussion") on the same page?


Lost content

I just lost a bunch of content that I had written here. Not sure how I did it, but it suggests that it might be pretty easy to lose what you're working on.