Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reference Compendium"

From c34.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Tech Notes moved to Talk:Reference Compendium: This page is not Tech Notes at all, but rather a good listing of all FAQs and Projects that currently exist on the HTML site.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
  
 
THESE ARE NOT TECH NOTES below.  If we're going to make links here, I suggest we reconsider posting them all, and just link to the main Projects and FAQ pages.  If, however, we DO want to link them up here, then we outght to work out a user friendly Table of Contents in alphabetical order that's useable and readable, an improved version of this link:  [http://c34.org/bbs/index.php?topic=4137.0]  Stu
 
THESE ARE NOT TECH NOTES below.  If we're going to make links here, I suggest we reconsider posting them all, and just link to the main Projects and FAQ pages.  If, however, we DO want to link them up here, then we outght to work out a user friendly Table of Contents in alphabetical order that's useable and readable, an improved version of this link:  [http://c34.org/bbs/index.php?topic=4137.0]  Stu
Line 7: Line 6:
 
Somehow I don't see all of the work being that necessary.
 
Somehow I don't see all of the work being that necessary.
  
 +
--
  
 
+
I just stuck these links here for ref while I was grabbing
--I just stuck these links here for ref while I was grabbing
 
 
some of the content & links to put into wiki pages.
 
some of the content & links to put into wiki pages.
  
Line 19: Line 18:
  
 
Either way having a page indexing all of the old material
 
Either way having a page indexing all of the old material
would be helpful.
+
would be helpful... I just didn't spend the time to describe
 +
each link.
 +
 
 +
-d

Latest revision as of 13:35, 4 January 2009

THESE ARE NOT TECH NOTES below. If we're going to make links here, I suggest we reconsider posting them all, and just link to the main Projects and FAQ pages. If, however, we DO want to link them up here, then we outght to work out a user friendly Table of Contents in alphabetical order that's useable and readable, an improved version of this link: [1] Stu

I think this page should just be Tech Notes. Use Jon's Knowledge Base as a start, delete everything except the TNs. Put the index (or a link to it with explaination) on this page. We should also probably make a similiar FAQ and project page. As the FAQs and Projects get migrated to the correct wiki page we will have to decide whether or not to keep the FAQ and Project pages. Ken

Somehow I don't see all of the work being that necessary.

--

I just stuck these links here for ref while I was grabbing some of the content & links to put into wiki pages.

If someone wants to clean this up, break this up... list all of the article in a better format go for it... eventually the point of the wiki will we to have enough wiki pages that either mirror and update the content of the faq/project pages or link to all of them.

Either way having a page indexing all of the old material would be helpful... I just didn't spend the time to describe each link.

-d