We are looking at hauling and doing a bottom job on Ciao Bella within a year. Here in San Diego there is a big push to move from Copper paint to non copper. I have done some research on CeRam-Kote an epoxy ceramic paint that has been tested here in San Deigo bay with some good results. Has any body else moved from copper paint and if so have you tried any of the ceramic epoxy paints.
Thank you,
Ralph
Ciao Bella
How does this stuff prevent growth?
It's my understanding that it is a hard epoxy but does not inhibit growth only lets it be scrubbed off as the cleaner does the hull scrub. Here in San Diego they are trying to legislate out the copper paint due to contaminates. I've got more studying to do before I go this type of bottom paint, but it says it has a 5 - 8 year life span between paintings. As I learn more I'll add it on here.
Thanks for the note,
Ralph
Well whatever goofy laws you guys out there think up, you can bet the rest of us are going to have to eventually suffer too.
These goofy laws originated in Norway and Sweden. They have test harbors in San Diego, Newport Beach, Marina Del Ray and San Francisco. I guess the copper is killing off the Zebra Muscles. :D :thumb:
Ralph
From what I have heard it is coming from the regional water quality control boards and that they are worried about the copper that comes off the paint and into the bottom sediment under the marinas. I have also heard that there is no evidence that this has been harmful to marine life. I have also heard a theory that the majority of the copper found at the bottom of marinas is from street runoff from automobile brakes. Who knows?
The state of California last year tried to implement a law that every individual marina (in the case of Marina del Rey - 13 marinas) would have to perform ongoing water quality tests at a cost of $100K per year plus per marina. Fortunately it didn't go through as these costs would be directly passed on to the slip tenants.
Several years ago I read a UC Davis report on the San Diego bottom paint study that said that the new copper-less pint would be cheaper to boaters in the long run because you would not have to haul out as often, but it assumed that you were already hauling out and doing your bottom every year with copper based paint and that you had your bottom scrubbed every month.
All good thoughts and comments guys.
http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/emon/surfwtr/caps.htm
Find the reports here at this link, it'll be here before we know it.
Ralph
Ciao Bella
Did anyone involved in the study happen to notice the plethora of U.S. Navy and commercial vessels at Coronado Island and 32nd St? Guess they don't use copper-based paint...
Let's see, one Nimitz class aircraft carrier bottom equals how many pleasure boats???
Steve,
Careful, inserting sanity into this discussion is very dangerous to reality.
Actually the navy went to a teflon based rubber type paint several years ago, in fact I've been retired for 13 years so it's longer then that. I can't say it's all through the fleet but I know they were doing tests on it and had ramped up the cleaning cycle on warships to keep the skirts off at the water line.
Ralph
Just got off the phone with Shelter Island Boatyard here in San Diego after scheduling my haulout for bottom paint next Wednesday. The buzz on the street is that the boatyards are expecially busy due to the number of folks rushing in to get their bottoms done with copper before any type of ordinance goes into effect. In order to stay ahead of the curve, Shelter Island boatyard, for one is making preparations to phase out any copper based paints. Apparently the new non-copper based paints run about $100 more per gallon... YIKES! :shock: The yards are also hunting for paint that will deliver comperable results as that of copper.
An interesting side note: The owner of SIBY told me that each year when they send in water samples of their marina and yard for testing, they also send a sample of salted drinking water.... every year their water samples pass with the exception of one... yep the drinking water.
I don't know if thats a testament of the accuracy of the tests... or the quality of our drinking water here in SD :D
Here's a good, thorough, recent discussion:
http://forums.catalina.sailboatowners.com/showthread.php?t=129085
All I've got to say is it's a short trip down the coast from SD to Ensanada, Mx. They'll put what the hell ever you want on the bottom of your boat.
But really, I'll get it done here early next year and not worry for another four years.
Ralph : There was a recent article in a marine magazine about a guy that got some USN submarine "bottom paint". It eliminated the barnacles and oysters on the pilings 5 slips away!! He only uses a face mask and rubber gloves - It almost killed him!!
I don't believe that it was Teflon based!! A thought
Holly cow Ron, that would be some good stuff. Not............Darn bubble heads.
California bill 623 passed the Senate. I'm certain it will be made into law for those of us in California. I'm also certain that other states will not be too far behind. For better or worse.
http://www.thelog.com/news/logNewsArticle.aspx?x=12378
Kevin,
Thanks fo rthe update on this hot topic. gotta get the bottom done while we can still get good paint.
Ralph
Would love to read the story Ron. Any chance you might dig that up for us?