Catalina 34    Message and Discussion


[C34 Home] [C34Tech Notes] [C34 Tech Wiki] [C34 Cruising Wiki] [Store] [Join C34IA]

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Take advantage of the new theme, update your forum profile.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Flexible coupling?  (Read 2227 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pjcomeau

  • Forum - Petty Officer 2nd Class
  • ****
  • Karma: 1
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Flexible coupling?
« on: May 13, 2008, 07:27:15 AM »

Has anyone used a flexible coupling other then Vetus Bullflex (go2marine has Bullflex 2 at $523). How about "R & D Marine" flexible coupling (I'm not sure how it fits/works). It looks like it may work with existing coupler.

As for regular coupling, when they ask for "solid" or "split" what does that mean?   I was looking at "Buck Algonquin" coupling selection guide (at www.deepblueyachtsupply.com).

Thanks,

Pierre
Logged
Pierre Comeau
Time To Keel, 1988 #687  Saint John, NB Canada

Steve Sayian

  • Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
  • *****
  • Karma: 3
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2008, 09:52:58 AM »

Pierre,

A split coupler has a split in the area where the prop shaft enters the coupler.  There are two bolts that when tightened, clamp around the shaft.  This allows you to also loosen the bolts and remove the shaft without disconnecting the entire coupler from the transmission.
A solid coupler is a one piece of machined metal that requires the shaft (sometimes) to be pressed in and always requires the removal of the coupler from the transmission to remove the shaft.

Steve
Logged
Steve Sayian
"Ocean Rose"
1999 Mk II
Wing, Std Rig, Kiwi Prop
#1448, Hingham, Mass

Ron Hill

  • Forum - Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
  • ********
  • Karma: 47
  • Posts: 5811
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2008, 05:05:42 PM »

Pierre : I have a Uniflex coupling - also from Vetus, which I've had since 1992!!   Vetus also has a Type 6 coupling which is a little cheaper.  A couple of options.   
After all it's only Boat $$ !!!
« Last Edit: May 13, 2008, 05:12:01 PM by Ron Hill »
Logged
Ron, Apache #788

Roc

  • Forum - Chief Petty Officer
  • ******
  • Karma: 3
  • Posts: 819
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2008, 04:57:39 AM »

I have a 'Federal' coupling.  Do a search on this site, and google for Federal and I think you'll find some information.
Logged
Roc - "Sea Life" 2000 MKII #1477.  Rock Hall, MD

Mike Vaccaro

  • Forum - Petty Officer 2nd Class
  • ****
  • Karma: 2
  • Posts: 185
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2008, 06:26:32 AM »

We have a Vetus Bullflex and have been very happy with it.  With the right engine mounts, it substantially reduces engine vibration.  The August 2004 Tech Notes has a write-up describing the installation.  For boats with the M-25, in addition to the coupling, replacement of the stock mounts with Vetus K75's on the aft and and K50's forward seems just about optimum.  For M-35's, K75's all around (although there is no harm in four K75s [which are slightly stiffer] with M-25 equipped boats either).   

Keep in mind that the installation of a flexible coupling minimizes the concern with engine alignment, but does not eliminate it.  The real purpose of the coupling is to reduce vibration transfered to the hull through the shaft log and strut, not to act as a "universal joint" for the running gear.  The engine should still be aligned following normal procedures after the new coupling is installed.  The Tech Notes article provides a method for changing the coupling with the boat in the water that requires the aft end of the existing shaft (the key way portion) to be cut off.

Cheers,

Mike

Logged
1988 C34 Hull #563
Std Rig / Wing Keel

David Sanner

  • Administrator
  • Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
  • *****
  • Karma: 5
  • Posts: 219
  • #611/1988 San Franscisco
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2008, 01:38:56 PM »

You might try this site: http://www.yachtsupplydepot.com/
as they seem to have better pricing  (about $70 less but still $455) . 
Also I think you need the studbolt kit.

The Type 6 looks interesting and selling for $109... simple to
install but I wonder how it stacks up to the Type 2 for
reducing vibration.







Logged
David Sanner, #611 1988, "Queimada" San Francisco Bay

tonywright

  • Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
  • *****
  • Karma: 5
  • Posts: 480
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2008, 02:30:38 PM »

I think that the MKII has a problem accomodating a Vetus Bullflex, if you also have a dripless stuffing box.

There is just not enough space for the Vetus, as I recall when I looked at it since it uses more space than the regular coupling. THere is very little open shaft between the coupling and the end of the PSS seal. MK I's don't seem to have this problem. The Federal or similar may be your only option on a MK II.

Of course I am very willing to be corrected by anyone who has successfully installed both a PSS seal and a Vetus Bullflex on their MK II?

Tony

Logged
Tony Wright
#1657 2003 34 MKII  "Vagabond"
Nepean Sailing Club, Ottawa, Canada

Roc

  • Forum - Chief Petty Officer
  • ******
  • Karma: 3
  • Posts: 819
    • View Profile
Re: Flexible coupling?
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2008, 04:57:39 AM »

Tony is right, there isn't enough room. The marina that did the work on my boat (new shaft and PSS seal), said the only coupling they knew would work is the Federal, due to the limited space.
Logged
Roc - "Sea Life" 2000 MKII #1477.  Rock Hall, MD
Pages: [1]   Go Up