The O ring model is the only one they sell for the engine now.
Well its all very confusing. I will call around again but Oberdorfer claims a flow rate the same as the Sherwood....so who knows. I guess perhaps I will call Westerbeke.
Yes, this "which pumps more water" issue is getting rather repetitious, but perhaps new for some.
Cliff & Ron, perhaps we can look at it this way:
--- The Oberdorfer cools the engine adequately. It works just fine with an M25 and M25XP. If you have either a 160 or 180 thermostat, the raw water pump will keep the engine working just fine, unless you still have a 2 inch HX on your M25. All M25XPs have 3 inch HXs. I installed a 3 inch HX on our M25 years ago. The Oberdorfer works great on my engine, 2480 engine hours. The old 2 inch HX would overheat just a tad if the WOT was employed for an extended period of time with my Oberdorfer. That's why I put in a 3 inch HX, which has been discussed in
Mainsheet magazine and this board ever since M25XP engines were used in C34s.
--- The Sherwood works great, too. So, even if it (does) (maybe does) or (maybe doesn't) pump the same amount of raw water as an Oberdorfer or more (in ANY proportion), from an engineering standpoint, it simply does not matter. Why? Because your engine will work just fine with EITHER PUMP.
Cliff, you can call Oberdorfer or Sherwood, but Ron has made it pretty clear over the years that the Sherwood costs dearly compared to the Oberdorfer, and my experience has been that the Sherwood access plate is kinda backwards.
My conclusion is rather simple: use either pump. Both will work. Don't "overthink" this 25 year old issue for M25 series engines. DEPCO is your friend.
