Catalina 34    Message and Discussion
Join the C34 Association Today!
    [C34 Home] [C34Tech Notes] [C34 Tech Wiki] [C34 Cruising Wiki] [Store] [Join C34IA]
May 23, 2012, 07:38:23 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Take advantage of the new theme, update your forum profile.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Question on Rocna anchor  (Read 1426 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
scotty
Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
*****

Karma: 2
Boat Name / Hull Number: Paradise/480
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 253



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2012, 01:36:32 AM »

Thought I'd share a different conclusion.  I've kept my Rocna 15, which was probably made in China.  There are several reasons for this:  The testing showes it meets specs. The company states that no 15 Kg anchors went to the USA market.  The weld work on my anchor is superior to the Manson Supreme that I was considering (I almost went for the West Marine rebate change).  It fits better on my roller.  The most salient reason is that the anchor is not the weakest component in my settup - the line (1/2" three strand) is.  Just thought I'd point out that there is no one correct answer on this particular question.
Logged

Scotty
2ndwish
Forum - Petty Officer 3rd Class
***

Karma: 3
Boat Name / Hull Number: 2nd Wish / 464
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2012, 12:20:57 PM »

Scotty- While I can't disagree with your conclusion, I would point out that bending strength and breaking strength are two different things...
T
Logged
mainesail
Forum - Petty Officer 2nd Class
****

Karma: 10
Boat Name / Hull Number: Cupecoy - CS-36T
Model Year: 1979
Home Port: Broad Cove, Maine
Posts: 169



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2012, 12:58:41 PM »

Thought I'd share a different conclusion.  I've kept my Rocna 15, which was probably made in China.  There are several reasons for this:  The testing showes it meets specs. The company states that no 15 Kg anchors went to the USA market.  The weld work on my anchor is superior to the Manson Supreme that I was considering (I almost went for the West Marine rebate change).  It fits better on my roller.  The most salient reason is that the anchor is not the weakest component in my settup - the line (1/2" three strand) is.  Just thought I'd point out that there is no one correct answer on this particular question.

I guess it all depends on what you consider to be "meets spec". The "spec" has been severely bastardized based on the DESIGNERS rather adamant rantings, for many years, that it "must be" 800 mpa steel and nothing else would suffice. They now claim 620 "meets spec"...

They also have never side loaded the anchor and have only conducted "head on" pull tests..

They also stuck West Marine with the warranty even when the Rocna warranty very, very clearly GUARANTEED the anchor "meets specifications". These specs were CLEARLY laid out by Peter Smith as 800 mpa. Rocna has not reimbursed WM for a single anchor throughout this debacle. WM is EATING THE COST and my local store has taken back four or five already. Had a Rocna 15 sitting on the floor the other day..
Logged

-Maine Sail

Casco Bay, ME
Boat - CS-36T
Maine Sail's Photo Galleries
http://www.pbase.com/mainecruising
dbpaul
Forum - Seaman
**

Karma: 1
Boat Name / Hull Number: C310 Tess Too #192
Model Year: 2002
Home Port: Anacortes, Wa
Posts: 40


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2012, 01:05:55 PM »

No matter which anchor...........
 I think the most important thing is....... if you do not mouse the shackle pin on your anchor setup, I do not know how you can sleep at night Sleepy



paulj      Thinking
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 14, 2012, 03:46:10 AM