Catalina 34    Message and Discussion
Join the C34 Association Today!
    [C34 Home] [C34Tech Notes] [C34 Tech Wiki] [C34 Cruising Wiki] [Store] [Join C34IA]
May 23, 2012, 06:48:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Put your boat on the Map (see the Wiki). (view boats)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Limit of Positive Stability  (Read 714 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Les Luzar
Forum - Petty Officer 3rd Class
***

Karma: 1
Boat Name / Hull Number: Windshadow #355
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 72


View Profile
« on: November 09, 2011, 08:36:08 PM »

I recently read the report following the Chicago - Mac race where the Kiwi 35 "Wingnuts" blew over in 60 knot sustained winds and capsized. That brought about a lot of discussion about the Limit of Positive Stability for various yacht designs and apparently most cruising/racing boats have a LPS of between 110 degrees and 120 degress. Wingnuts had a LPS of between 74 degrees to 100.7 degress! Does anyone know what the Limit of Positive Stability is for a C-34?  Shocked
Logged

Les Luzar
#355    1987
Windshadow
Long Beach, CA
2ndwish
Forum - Petty Officer 3rd Class
***

Karma: 3
Boat Name / Hull Number: 2nd Wish / 464
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2011, 12:59:37 AM »

This link gives an approximation... LPS=Angle of Vanishing Stability

http://www.sailingusa.info/cal__avs.htm

My best guess at the specs in their tool puts it in the ~125 deg range...
T
« Last Edit: November 10, 2011, 01:19:28 AM by 2ndwish » Logged
rondegroot
Forum - Seaman Apprentice
*

Karma: 0
Boat Name / Hull Number: Mundora 1726
Model Year: 2005
Home Port: Brisbane
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2011, 09:25:29 PM »

When I purchased my C34 back in 2005 I asked Catalina for the stability figures.

They advised
Limit of Positive Stability 127 degrees
STIX  36.25

cheers
Ron
Mundora 1726 (2005)
Logged
scotty
Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
*****

Karma: 2
Boat Name / Hull Number: Paradise/480
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 253



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2011, 10:46:20 PM »

WWhen I did the VAS calculation I got 133.  Another interesting source of information is the Catalina 34 FAQ, Measures of Seaworthyness: www.c34.org/faq-pages/faq-quantitative.html#CAPSIZE%20RISK
I really think that the main consideration for offshore capability has to do with preparation, not stability.  One interesting thread is: www.c34.org/bbs/index.php/topic,4378.0.html   Another is:  www.c34.org/bbs/index.php/topic,2034.0.html

I have read (but couldn't find it to give you the link) that a particular concern is that the scantlings and hull thickness of the Catalina 34 are such that there is an unaceptable amount of oil canning", or flexing, that occurs in the hull on prolonged ocean passages.  This can lead to a variety of problems, and is something that would be hard to fix.

Is the Catalina 34 a stable platform for offshore (or Chicago to Mac) passages?  Seems to depend on three factors:  Good preparation, Good seamanship and Good luck (Acts of God).
« Last Edit: November 14, 2011, 10:49:53 PM by scotty » Logged

Scotty
Ken Heyman
Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
*****

Karma: 3
Posts: 372


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2011, 08:46:41 AM »

That's interesting Scotty, because I have often seen the Catalina 34 referred to as a "stiff" boat albeit generally not recommended for long ocean passages without modification.That said others have sailed the 34 on long ocean passages and evidently have had a combination of good preparation and good luck. BTW what are "scantlings" ?

Thanks,
Ken
Logged

Ken Heyman
1988 c34 #535
"Wholesailor"
Chicago, Il
tonywright
Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
*****

Karma: 5
Boat Name / Hull Number: Vagabond, #1657
Model Year: 2003
Home Port: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 396



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2011, 11:37:57 AM »

Despite all empirical evidence to the contrary, I see that everyone is using the "design weight"  of 12,550 in these calculations, rather than the actual measured weight of 16,000-17,000 lb.

It seems to me this has to have a significant impact on the rating! Depending on what numbers you put in for hull draft below the waterline (note that this has to exclude the keel), and how much weight you ascribe to the keel (presumably this exceeded its design weight goal as well), you can come up with a much higher stability number (upwards of 150). This would explain the stiffness of the boat.

Please stop using the 12,550 lb number. It simply does not reflect reality. Does Gerry have a revised number for the keel weight, or should we just add 25-30% in line with the general increase in weight?

On a similar note, we maybe need to be more careful to warn new owners about the real weight. It affects trailer and towing specifications, winter cradles, the size of a crane needed to lift it, etc. All of which could lead to dangerous situations if undersized. How about creating  a revised spec sheet?

Tony
Logged

Tony Wright
#1657 2003 34 MKII  "Vagabond"
Nepean Sailing Club, Ottawa, Canada
Ken Juul
Forum - Master Chief Petty Officer
*******

Karma: 9
Posts: 1583



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2011, 02:13:19 PM »

I don't think the keel weighs much more than the specified weight, the weight of lead is known.  I think the extra comes from the solid fiberglass/resin used in making the hull.
Logged

Ken & Vicki Juul
Luna Loca #1090
Chesapeake Bay
Past Commodore C34IA
scotty
Forum - Petty Officer 1st Class
*****

Karma: 2
Boat Name / Hull Number: Paradise/480
Model Year: 1987
Home Port: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 253



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2011, 06:42:20 PM »

I used a 1500 lb figure to plug into the formula (that's why the number I got was 133).  From wikipedia:  "In shipbuilding, the scantling refers to the collective dimensions of the various parts, particularly the framing and structural supports."  I've always thought of this as the bulkheads, frames  and stringers making up the skeleton of the boat.  Particularly important is the manner in which they are attached, or tied together.  Catalina often refers, with some pride, to the structural "grid" that is the basis for hull integrety (look at the Catalina Yachts homepage).  
Logged

Scotty
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 14, 2012, 01:16:20 AM